Friday, November 4, 2016

事工聲明:關於全球預言42 聲明

事工聲明: 最近因著全球預言22, 42 和46的緣故, 收到許多愛主的牧者,弟兄姐們的信件,不能一一回复。相信他們都是為了愛護事工和保護事工的緣故, 怕最後預言出狀況,被人定罪, 然後事工會備受打擊, 往後難以開展工作和神的託付。謝謝各位在主裡的紀念和愛。瀏覽了他們發來的,其他許多有名望的牧者對美國大選川普擔任總統的預言或是代禱信件。

其實事工曾經在2016年9月撤下預言42, 結果幾天后,受到神的嚴厲責備。並指定於2016年10月5日再次刊登。結果又逃避,當天早上就收到一位牧者的電話,告知神在夜間指示她給我們電話, 問我們今天是否刊登了關於大選的預言。於是又再度刊登。這是事情的經過:

另外11月5日,又指示發表以下聲明:
我們的回復如下,聖經裡有一位人物叫 約拿。神本叫他到尼尼微城宣告 毀滅。可是神後來懊悔了!約拿書 3:1-2耶和華的話二次臨到約拿說:你起來!往尼尼微大城去,向其中的居民宣告我所吩咐你的話。約拿書2:4“約拿進城走了一日,宣告說:再等四十日,尼尼微必傾覆了!”約拿書2:10“於是神察看他們的行為,見他們離開惡道,他就後悔,不把所說的災禍降與他們了。”

於是約拿就在尼尼微城眾人前當眾出醜。因為他的預言沒有成就。但是請問約拿是神揀選的器皿嗎,是神揀選的先知嗎?神看重的是人心, 器皿的順服。預言是神的事情, 人只不過是器皿,無論器皿如何被神用, 都是神的事情。如果人只顧自己的尊榮和顏面, 請問神如何用這個管道呢?

事工忠心於神的託付。相信各位在信裡提到的人物, 牧者都是神在這個世代重用的器皿,也是忠心於神的託付。只是神量給個人,事工的份, 有所不同。或許神給他們的是約拿的角色, 或許是我們, 我不曉得, 其實 都是在承擔末後神給的角色和位份而已。不明白的事情, 我們也只能多多求問主。並且凡事獻上感謝!這兩位美國的候選人,如果照我個人的心意,誰都不像個候選人,都是政客,參選的時候,對選民諸多承諾,有哪位選後能照著原來的競選大綱施政的。為了得著基督徒,就去入教,為了得著同性戀,就去參加同性戀的組織。為了得著財團的支持,也是諸多許諾。關鍵神要在美國作什麼?什麼才是神的旨意?

如果神用尼尼微城的事情來提醒美國。我相信正是這個時候,美國的基督徒們是個極大的考驗。起來如尼尼微城的百姓一樣,宣告禁食,從最大的到至小的都穿麻衣。人要切切求告神。各人回頭離開所行的惡道,丟棄手中的強暴。或者神轉意後悔,不發烈怒,使我們不致滅亡,也未可知。 是當為個人每個人自己的罪悔改的時候,才是看見轉機的關鍵。而不是撲上大選,為某人背書。神自然作他要作的事情。願各位共勉。

經文:約拿書 3:5-9尼尼微人信服神,便宣告禁食,從最大的到至小的都穿麻衣(或譯:披上麻布)。這信息傳到尼尼微王的耳中,他就下了寶座,脫下朝服,披上麻布,坐在灰中。他又使人遍告尼尼微通城,說:王和大臣有令,人不可嘗什麼,牲畜、牛羊不可吃草,也不可喝水。人與牲畜都當披上麻布;人要切切求告神。各人回頭離開所行的惡道,丟棄手中的強暴。或者神轉意後悔,不發烈怒,使我們不致滅亡,也未可知。



 .......................................................................
全球預言 42

在2015年3月10日的淩晨禱告裏, 請參考事工全球預言22,關於 2016 年美國總統大選,我把它放在了預言的第五條,聖靈酷酷的只回復了我一句話:
5. 四季節紊亂的一年,女總統出現在北美。
(回顧以前的記錄,原來在 2013年3月, 同樣的預言在筆記本上有記錄,奇妙!)

全球預言 42


時間: 2016年8月11日 凌晨 6:00AM

美國2016年大選 北美出現女總統 時間:
2016年8月11日 淩晨 6:00AM 我在前段時間遇見許多牧者和代禱者,甚至美國的代禱機構給事工發信,要我們支持並呼籲各處有投票權的基督徒投票川普。 甚至有教導說,先知的禱告可以改變國度的方向,改變神的心意。雖然我已經在2015年看見2016年大選的結果,仍然願意再來尋求。

於是我在禱告裏尋求新的答案,神卻沒有理睬我。到了8月11日,事工幾位代禱者來地下室為幾天後舉辦的會議禱告, 那天淩晨,突然神給了我許多異象,其中是有關美國大選的。 內容是對2015年3月的確認吧。

异象一: 1,在幾百人聚集的美國總統候選人競選總部裏,許多工作人員身著藍色制服,突然屏幕的數據攀升,時鐘敲響,所有的人歡呼雀躍地跳起來, 甚至有人手裏的咖啡杯往天花板上飛擲。一位女士登上競選勝利的舞臺。

2,與她在競選中的對手是位男士,穿上挂滿勛章的衣服(外套), 像個驕傲的將軍,突然時鐘敲響,他坐在一處,幾個行李箱就放在他的旁邊,火車的響聲由遠處駛來。

3,一位女人斜靠在一個淺色的沙發的扶手邊,雙手交叉在胸前,兩腿也斜斜地交叠者。 她在辦公室的那頭,這是個遠景。 而近景是奧巴馬同時出現在這幅异像裏,他站在前面,他的身後是一張白色的單人沙發椅子, 他在异像裏的樣子是被明顯放大的,意思是他在選舉程序結束後,他在美國或是世界仍舊有極其巨大的影響力,什麽樣的作法可以導致奧巴馬依然能够呆在美國政治舞臺的前鋒, 很顯然。後面那位被選出來或任命的人物却顯得小了。

感動:這异象1 2 是非常明顯,北美出現了女總統。 可是异象3 却描述了在這次程序結束後,女總統的位置却幷沒有能超越奧巴馬在美國和國際舞臺的地位或是比他更引人注目。

在這篇預言刊登一段時間後,我一直被一件事情困擾,就是爲何在競選之後,奧巴馬可以站在這位女總統之前,到底這位女性總統,又受什麽制約,我很想知道答案,因爲在這裏,我解釋不出來。我可以明白的是,

奧巴馬出現在《啓示錄》第六章的揭開第一印裏,我們進入了産難的起頭。啓6:2 「我就觀看,見有一匹白馬;騎在馬上的,拿著弓,幷有冠冕賜給他。他便出來,勝了又要勝。」
他是那位騎在白馬上的迷惑之子Deceiver,然而他是否真是敵基督呢?我不覺得,敵基督要在啓示錄的第13章才出現。(詳解請見附錄)。 當奧巴馬他在 2009年獲得諾貝爾和平獎後,他在啓6:2的位置就奠定下來。 第一印揭開,人類進入産難的起頭 . (注意:这是 産難的起頭,是发生在7 年大灾难之前。)

(與路加 21:8 「耶穌說:『你們要謹慎,不要受迷惑;因爲將來有好些人冒我的名來,說:我是基督。又說:時候近了。你們不要跟從他們。」和 馬太 24:4-5 耶穌回答說:『你們要謹慎,免得有人迷惑你們。因爲將來有好些人冒我的名來,說:我是基督。幷且要迷惑許多人。相吻合, 參考文章)

當人提到SECOND COMING 都知道是指耶穌基督,可是這裏還有另外一位被NEWSWEEK稱呼他THE SECOND COMING就是OBAMA


2008年初次當選美國總統,並于2012年成功連任。2009年10月9日,獲得諾貝爾委員會頒發的諾貝爾和平獎。這白馬擁有和平的冠冕, 但手上拿著欺騙的弓, 以假和平迷惑地上的人。

摘錄:http://www.businessinsider.com/newsweek-on-obamas-second-coming-2013-1







NEWSWEEK NOW SAYS THAT OBAMA IS ‘THE SECOND COMING’ Newsweek celebrated President Obama's upcoming inauguration with a "cover" that calls the event "the second coming," an apparent reference to the return of Jesus Christ...

http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/newsweek-now-says-that-obama-is-the-second-coming/

Although it is now digital, Newsweek celebrated President Obama’s upcoming inauguration with a “cover” that calls the event “the second coming,” an apparent reference to the return of Jesus Christ, The Blaze reported Friday.

A post at Twitchy called the cover “creepy,” while The Blaze described it as “controversial” and “questionable.” The cover highlights an article by former editor Evan Thomas, who once compared Obama to God “Well, we were the good guys in 1984, it felt that way. It hasn’t felt that way in recent years. So Obama’s had, really, a different task We’re seen too often as the bad guys. And he – he has a very different job from – Reagan was all about America, and you talked about it. Obama is ‘we are above that now.’ We’re not just parochial, we’re not just chauvinistic, we’re not just provincial. We stand for something – I mean in a way Obama’s standing above the country, above – above the world, he’s sort of God,” he told Chris Matthews in 2009. This is not the first time Newsweek has used such a theme when portraying Obama.

A COVER IN 2010 CALLED HIM “GOD OF ALL THINGS” AND ANOTHER COVER USED RELIGIOUS IMAGERY WHEN PRAISING THE PRESIDENT FOR HIS LATEST STAND SUPPORTING GAY MARRIAGE.

After Obama won re-election, Newsweek portrayed him as a conqueror dressed in an 18th century uniform. Twitchy noted that a number of conservatives on Twitter were repulsed by the cover.

“I don’t tend to get indignantly offended that easily, but this Newsweek cover is makes me ill,”tweeted Ben Howe.
“The Second Coming? Really? You’ve got to be kidding me,” another person wrote.

Another Twitter user said the publication went “full Jim Jones,” a reference to the cult leader who led his followers to their death by drinking poison. Twitchy reminded readers that Newsweek was not as nice to George W. Bush when he was inaugurated in 2005. source – Examiner






摘自:http://www.nationalreview.com/article/439433/iran-ransom-payment-obama-administration-transfer-funds-unconstitutional 


OBAMA ADMINISTRATION REFUSES TO EXPLAIN TO CONGRESS DETAILS OF $1.3 BILLION PAYMENT TO IRAN

by Geoffrey Grider August 23, 2016

The $400 million was part of a $1.7 billion legal settlement reached with Iran earlier this year. Congressional inquiries into how this money reached Iran are failing to get answers. The State and Treasury Departments declined on Tuesday to answer a series of questions from the Free Beacon about the method in which U.S. taxpayer funds were paid to Iran.



HE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION IS WITHHOLDING FROM CONGRESS DETAILS ABOUT HOW $1.3 BILLION IN U.S. TAXPAYER FUNDS WAS DELIVERED TO IRAN, ACCORDING TO CONVERSATIONS WITH LAWMAKERS WHO SAID THAT THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOW STONEWALLING AN OFFICIAL INQUIRY INTO THE MATTER.

The Departments of State, Treasury, and Justice have all rebuffed a congressional probe into the circumstances surrounding the $1.3 billion payment to Iran, which is part of an additional $400 million cash payout that occurred just prior to the release of several U.S. hostages and led to accusations that the administration had paid Iran a ransom.

The Obama administration has admitted in recent days that the $400 million cash delivery to Iran was part of an effort to secure the release of these American hostages, raising further questions on Capitol Hill about White House efforts to suppress these details from the public. The $400 million was part of a $1.7 billion legal settlement reached with Iran earlier this year. Congressional inquiries into how this money reached Iran are failing to get answers. The State and Treasury Departments declined on Tuesday to answer a series of questions from the Free Beacon about the method in which U.S. taxpayer funds were paid to Iran.

The administration is also withholding key details about the payment from leading members of Congress, including Sens. Ted Cruz (R., Texas) and Mike Lee (R., Utah), who launched an inquiry into the matter earlier this month.

THE DEPARTMENTS OF STATE, TREASURY, AND JUSTICE ALL FAILED TO RESPOND TO THE INQUIRY BY MONDAY’S DEADLINE, ACCORDING TO CONGRESSIONAL SOURCES TRACKING THE MATTER.

“The already bizarre circumstances surrounding the $1.7 billion payment to the Islamic Republic have only gotten stranger in the weeks since we learned of the $400 million in cash that was sent to the Iranian regime last January 16th,” Cruz said to the Free Beacon. “If this payment was, as the Obama administration insists, a straightforward settlement of an old debt that it would have cost America more to contest, why all the secrecy?”

The State Department said it does not know how the remaining $1.3 billion was transferred or to whom it was transferred. Cruz described this disclosure as “confounding.”

“It is even more confounding that the State Department spokesman claimed Monday not to know how or to whom the residual $1.3 billion was transferred, although he does know the transaction happened,” Cruz said. “That kind of money doesn’t just transfer itself to a rogue regime still under heavy U.S. sanctions for its sponsorship of terrorism. Someone in our government must have the answers the American people deserve.”

CRUZ AND LEE ARE SEEKING TO DETERMINE IF THESE PAYMENTS VIOLATED U.S. LAW. THEY ALSO REQUESTED INFORMATION ABOUT THE U.S. OFFICIALS WHO NEGOTIATED AND CARRIED OUT THE PAYMENTS.

“While we are deeply concerned about the national security implications of the administration’s cash-for-hostages scheme, especially in light of reports that Iran has already arrested additional Americans, the purpose of this letter is to inquire about the legality of the payment,” the senators wrote in an Aug. 12 letter.

“It is imperative that the administration provide a full accounting of its conduct with respect to the $400 million cash payment to Iran,” they wrote. “If the administration violated the law, then Congress and the American people should be made aware of it so that they can hold the appropriate officials accountable and take whatever steps necessary to strengthen the law and prevent any reoccurrence.” While the administration has remained silent about the circumstances surrounding the payment, investigative reporter Claudia Rosett recently disclosed that the Treasury Department transferred just under $1.3 billion to the State Department in 13 “large identical sums.” The funds, allocated for “foreign claims,” could shine a light on how the administration moved taxpayer funds into the State Department’s purview in order to provide the additional payment to Iran.

In 13 individual payments of $99,999,999.99, the Treasury Department moved a total of 1,299,999,999.87, which roughly amounts to the remaining money owed to Iran.

source

2 comments:

  1. 有不少人也預言美國會出現女總統,不過是在2020年。你會否搞錯了日期,而該女總統是一位漂亮的女人,背後支持她的是奧巴馬。https://z3news.com/w/prophetic-dream-reveals-winner-2020-presidential-election/

    ReplyDelete
  2. 選舉結果是川普上,所以到底是?

    ReplyDelete